google-site-verification: googlebc47d07320294fb4.html

Google search antitrust trial updates: Everything you need to know (so far)

Google is on trial for allegedly using underhand tactics to ensure it stays the world’s leading search engine.

The U.S. Justice Department claims Google, which owns a 90% market share in search, paid massive sums to companies like Apple to make it the default search engine on products like the iPhone.

These multibillion-dollar deals gave Google an unfair advantage, the DOJ alleges, making it nearly impossible for rival companies to compete.

The trial will last 10 weeks and include testimonies from key figures like Alphabet and Google CEO Sundar Pichai.

The outcome of the landmark case could bring significant changes to Google and the future of the Internet. But it’s equally likely the trial will result in no changes and Google will be free to continue operating however it wants.

We’ll keep updating this article with the latest developments from this landmark trial.

As the trial is set to cover many Google search-related issues, we have organized the updates by topic to make the timeline easier to follow.

Google credits its 90% market share to being a superior platform (Sept. 12)

  • John Schmidtlein, lead lawyer for Google, claims the company dominates the search market due to being a superior product.
  • Google argues that users can easily switch to rival search engines even if it’s the default.
  • Antonio Rangel, a California Institute of Technology economist, testified that Google’s defaults discourage users from switching, saying switching to a different search engine is not easy.
  • He cited an example where switching to Bing from Google on an Android 12 phone required 10 steps, describing it as “considerable choice friction”, reports Business Insider.
alleged search monopoly

Google ‘hid and destroyed evidence’ (Sept. 12)

  • Justice Department attorney Kenneth Dintzer accused Google of “hiding and destroying documents because they knew they were violating the antitrust laws”, reports Bloomberg.
  • In his opening statement on day one, Dintzer presented evidence to show that Google was knowingly breaking laws.
  • He pointed to an October 2021 chat message from CEO Pichai, which read: “Need the link for my leaders circle tomorrow…can we change the setting of this group to history off… thanks.”
  • When history is off, conversations are auto-deleted after 24 hours.
  • Google declined to comment.

Apple allegedly didn’t want a default search engine (Sept. 12)

  • The DOJ revealed that Apple intended to provide users with a choice screen to select between Google and Yahoo as their search engine.
  • However, Google rejected this proposal with the statement “No default placement, no revenue share,” as stated in an email.
  • Kenneth Dintzer, the lead attorney for the DOJ, characterized Google’s response as a monopolistic action.

Google pays $10 billion a year to maintain default status (Sept. 12)

  • Justice Department attorney Dintzer accused Google of recognizing the important of default status and said this was the reason why the company spent more than $10 billion a year to brands like Apple.
  • Dintzer added that ” this wheel has been turning for more than 12 years and it always turns to Google’s advantage.”
  • He claimed Google staff had previously described losing the company’s search default status on mobile as a “code red situation”.
  • Google’s counterargument said that despite commanding 90% of the search market share, it faces competition from companies like Amazong, Microsoft’s Bing and Yelp.
  • Google attorney John Schmidtlein, added: “There are lots of way users access the web other than default search engines, and people use them all the time.”

Google calls its competition ‘inferior’ (Sept. 12)

  • Google’s lawyer, Schmidtlein, argued in court that the government is pursuing a regressive lawsuit.
  • He said the claims was “all in the hopes that forcing people to use inferior products in the short run will somehow be good for competition in the long run.”

Google’s search engine default status on phones was a ‘priority’ (Sept. 13)

  •  Chris Barton, who worked for Google from 2004 to 2011, said negotiating deals to make Google the default search engine on mobile devices was a top priority during his time at the company.
  • He claimed that in return for default status, phone service providers and manufacturers were guaranteed a portion of ad click revenue.
  • This strategy, central to the government’s antitrust case, aimed to establish Google as the primary search engine across various devices, reports News Bytes.

Google faced competition to become default search engine on mobile (Sept. 13)

  • Former Googler, Barton, emphasized that Google faced competition from other search engines in becoming the default choice for phone companies during his testimony,.
  • In a 2011 email exchange, Google executives observed that AT&T had selected Yahoo as its default search engine, while Verizon had opted for Microsoft’s Bing.
  • Barton testified that he encountered a challenge because mobile carriers were fixated on revenue share percentages.
  • He aimed to convince potential partners that Google’s high-quality searches would lead to more clicks and greater advertising revenue, even with a lower percentage share.

Googlers were told to be mindful of their language (Sept. 13)

  • Google staff were allegedly told back as far as 2023 to avoid using certain terms to avoid being perceived as “monopolists”.
  • A memo written by Google Chief Economist Hal Varian read: “We have to be sensitive about antitrust considerations…We should be careful about what we say in both public and private.”
  • Staff were told to avoid terms like “market share” and “bundle”.

Get the daily newsletter search marketers rely on.

<input type="hidden" name="utmMedium" value="“>
<input type="hidden" name="utmCampaign" value="“>
<input type="hidden" name="utmSource" value="“>
<input type="hidden" name="utmContent" value="“>
<input type="hidden" name="pageLink" value="“>
<input type="hidden" name="ipAddress" value="“>

Processing…Please wait.

function getCookie(cname) {
let name = cname + “=”;
let decodedCookie = decodeURIComponent(document.cookie);
let ca = decodedCookie.split(‘;’);
for(let i = 0; i <ca.length; i++) {
let c = ca[i];
while (c.charAt(0) == ' ') {
c = c.substring(1);
}
if (c.indexOf(name) == 0) {
return c.substring(name.length, c.length);
}
}
return "";
}
document.getElementById('munchkinCookieInline').value = getCookie('_mkto_trk');


Verdict. U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta isn’t expected to issue a ruling until early next year. If he decides Google broke the law, another trial will decide what steps should be taken to rein in the Mountain View, California-based company.

Why we care: If the US Government wins this case, it could mean Google is no longer automatically installed as the default search engine on everyday products, which could threaten its position as the world’s search leader. This means rival companies like Yahoo could realistically stand a chance of taking Google’s crown for the first time, which could bring significant changes to the search landscape as we know it.

What’s at stake. The U.S. and state allies are not asking for money; they want a court order to stop Google from its alleged unfair practices. This order could greatly affect Google’s business. For example:

  • The court could potentially split up the company as a solution.
  • On a broader scale, the Justice Department might argue that it aims to prevent Google from using its alleged search monopoly to secure exclusive deals in new markets, like AI.

This lawsuit is considered one of the most significant challenges to the tech industry’s dominance since the DOJ sued Microsoft in 1998 for its control of the personal computer market. In that case, the trial court ruled that Microsoft had unlawfully attempted to hinder the rival browser Netscape Navigator. Microsoft ultimately reached a settlement that didn’t break up the company.

If Google’s lead attorney Schmidtelein looks familiar, that may be because he represented Microsoft against the DOJ in the 1998 trial.

Deep dive. Read the US Justice Department’s official statement for more information on why it is suing Google.

The post Google search antitrust trial updates: Everything you need to know (so far) appeared first on Search Engine Land.

Original source: https://searchengineland.com/google-search-antirust-trial-hearing-updates-431977

33 thoughts on “Google search antitrust trial updates: Everything you need to know (so far)”

  1. I just could not depart your website before suggesting that I extremely loved the standard information an individual
    provide in your guests? Is gonna be again continuously to check up on new posts

  2. Good day! I just want to give you a big thumbs up for your excellent information you have
    right here on this post. I am coming back to your blog for more soon.

  3. Hi there just wanted to give you a quick heads up.

    The text in your post seem to be running off the screen in Internet explorer.
    I’m not sure if this is a format issue or something to do with web
    browser compatibility but I figured I’d post to let you know.

    The design look great though! Hope you get the problem resolved soon.
    Kudos

  4. Simply wish to say your article is as surprising. The clearness in your
    submit is simply nice and that i can suppose you’re an expert on this subject.
    Well with your permission allow me to grasp your
    RSS feed to keep updated with approaching post.
    Thanks 1,000,000 and please keep up the enjoyable work.

  5. Great blog you’ve got here.. It’s hard to find high quality writing like
    yours nowadays. I honestly appreciate individuals like you!

    Take care!!

  6. I’m impressed, I must say. Rarely do I come across a blog
    that’s both equally educative and interesting, and without a
    doubt, you’ve hit the nail on the head. The problem is something that
    too few people are speaking intelligently about.
    Now i’m very happy that I came across this in my search for something relating
    to this.

  7. For most recent information you have to go to see internet and on internet I found this web site
    as a best website for newest updates.

  8. Hey there! This post could not be written any better!
    Reading through this post reminds me of my previous room mate!
    He always kept talking about this. I will forward this article to him.
    Fairly certain he will have a good read. Many thanks for sharing!

  9. Outstanding post however I was wanting to know
    if you could write a litte more on this topic? I’d be very grateful if you could elaborate a little bit more.

    Appreciate it!

  10. Thanks for the marvelous posting! I quite enjoyed reading it, you might be a great author.I will
    be sure to bookmark your blog and will come back later in life.
    I want to encourage one to continue your great work, have a nice evening!

  11. Have you ever considered creating an ebook or guest authoring on other
    sites? I have a blog centered on the same information you
    discuss and would really like to have you share some stories/information. I know my viewers would appreciate your
    work. If you are even remotely interested, feel free to shoot me an email.

  12. Hi there! This is my first comment here so I just wanted to give a
    quick shout out and tell you I really enjoy reading your articles.
    Can you suggest any other blogs/websites/forums that cover the same subjects?

    Thanks a lot!

  13. Hello there! This is kind of off topic but I need some advice from an established blog.
    Is it hard to set up your own blog? I’m not very techincal but I can figure things
    out pretty fast. I’m thinking about creating my own but
    I’m not sure where to start. Do you have any ideas or suggestions?
    Cheers

  14. Hey! Do you use Twitter? I’d like to follow you if that would be okay.
    I’m definitely enjoying your blog and look forward to new updates.

  15. What i don’t understood is actually how
    you are no longer actually a lot more neatly-preferred than you may be right now.
    You are so intelligent. You realize thus significantly with regards to this matter, made
    me in my opinion believe it from so many various angles.
    Its like men and women are not interested except
    it is something to accomplish with Woman gaga!
    Your individual stuffs excellent. At all times handle it up!

  16. You’re so awesome! I do not suppose I’ve read through a
    single thing like that before. So wonderful to discover someone with a few unique thoughts on this subject.
    Really.. many thanks for starting this up. This web site is one thing that’s needed on the web, someone with some originality!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

+ +